Google’s AI blizzard
Google held its annual ‘IO’ developer event/product launch, and as ever there were hundreds of different announcements. It’s probably worth watching the entire two-hour keynote, but there are two things worth calling out. First, incumbents always try to make the new thing a feature, but sometimes they’re right: Google has a huge number of products and surfaces, and it’s adding AI features to all of them.
But second, Google is pushing all the way to change search from navigation to synthesis and summary. Search results haven’t been the plain vanilla ’10 blue links’ for a long time, as Google created vertical structured products around eg restaurants, but now the search box itself will become dynamic, morphing and changing into new forms and generating its own little widgets and tools. On the other side, you’ll be able to set up your own ‘agents’ that keep track of new results and tell you when things change (though this demo seemed extremely geeky).
For all of this, Google continues to shift emphasis from taking you to a resource made by someone else to generating its own summary or version of the answer, made from everything it’s seen on the web. Google will tell you the answer, based on the averages of everything other people have made. If you search for a ‘how to’, YouTube will take you to the right place in the video (YouTube itself has replaced a lot of web pages for content that doesn’t necessarily need to be video, because content creators can access a network, a recommendation system, and of course, a direct revenue payout). Next year, it might make you a video.
As many people have discussed in the last year or two, this is a pretty direct challenge to the implicit social contract of search: that publishers let Google index their content (and make money from ads on that) and in exchange, Google sends them traffic. Now every publisher is thinking about ‘Google Zero’ - no traffic from search at all. But then, how does the web work? Ironically, this is a function of competition: if Google doesn’t do this, OpenAI will, if this is where the users are going. But I don’t think anyone really knows what this means. KEYNOTE, SEARCH
SpaceX
SpaceX filed for an IPO. You can read the document here, and see this week’s column. LINK
For reference, a useful paper on the case for AI data centres in space. LINK
Quarterly numbers
Over the last two years, OpenAI and Anthropic have from time to time given numbers for ‘annualised revenue’, which generally takes the previous four weeks and multiplies by 13, though OpenAI gives a number net of payments to its partners and Anthropic has been giving a gross number. Now, as they both (especially OpenAI) get close to filing for an IPO, quarterly numbers are leaking. The WSJ says Anthropic has $4.8bn revenue in Q1 and will hit $10.9bn in Q2, with a small operating loss in Q1 and $559bn operating profit in Q2. (Meanwhile, it’s been widely reported that the annualised revenue number has now hit $45bn.) The Information reports OpenAI had $5.7bn revenue in Q1, with a negative 122% ‘adjusted operating margin’. None of this is GAAP, obviously. These companies are still burning enormous amounts of cash to deliver that revenue, but if you’re thinking that this isn’t really useful, this level of customer spending should wake you up. ANTHROPIC, OPENAI
Tokenmania
The tech industry is in a severe supply/demand crunch, as agentic coding works so well that usage is suddenly massively ahead of available capacity (I touched on this in my new presentation - I think this is temporary and will play out like mobile data). This week, Marc Benioff at Salesforce says he expects to spend $300m on Anthropic tokens this year (though really, who knows?), OpenAI announced an option to buy guaranteed capacity (which is probably a good buy in the short term and a bad buy in the long term), and OpenAI also said it would give $2m of free tokens to every company in the current YC batch (customer acquisition). SALESFORCE, CAPACITY, YCOMBINATOR
Unwinding Manus
Last month, the Chinese government ordered the cancellation of Meta’s acquisition of Manus, but given it has already been completed and the tech and team absorbed, it was hard to know how to comply. Now Bloomberg reports that the three founders are in talks to raise at least $1bn from Chinese investors to buy it LINK
The week in AI
Donald Trump’s AI regulation executive order was suddenly postponed, apparently after a bunch of tech execs grabbed the phone. (Just a thought, but perhaps the US court could try having one of those ‘legislature’ things, where you could elect a bunch of thoughtful and moderate people to spend time working out what laws should be and then passing them, in some kind of coherent, transparent process?) LINK
Bloomberg says that Cursor, the coding company now in a deal with xAI, reached $3bn annualised revenue in late April. LINK
Andrej Karpathy, a leading AI researcher and a prominent independent voice, decided to take a job at Anthropic. LINK
Google and Blackstone are doing a $5bn JV to create an AI neocloud built on Google’s TPU chips. Google wants more volume on TPU production and more developers using them, plus this is a way for Google to serve more AI demand without taking the infrastructure onto its own balance sheet. LINK
|