Hello discoverers!

I don’t intend for DD to turn into another op-ed column chasing the week’s AI headlines, but if you’ve read the last few issues, you’ll have noticed I keep circling the same question: what kind of power is being built around these tools, and what can the rest of us do about it?

So the title of Garrett Bucks’ recent essay got my attention: The opposite of the apocalypse is a neighborhood

Bucks expresses something that goes through my head whenever I hear one of these CEOs talking nonchalantly about the likelihood of the end times:

“If I were an executive at a company that produced water guzzling theft machines, and I also believed that there was more than a 10% chance that my robots would kill us all, I’d like to think that I’d offer more than vague gestures of concern.”

Like Bucks, I think the apocalypse talk is overcooked. The more pressing worry is the one Bucks borrows from Tressie McMillan Cottom: that AI is just one visible part of “a superstructure that merges regressive politics with unchecked economic power in the guise of technological innovation”.

Gary Marcus makes a similar point in another recent essay. Extinction isn’t what keeps him up at night. Wars escalated by AI-generated disinformation and hacks on critical infrastructure do.

“My p(doom) is low; my p(dystopia) is high.”

A handful of men rewriting the rules of the economy and geopolitics out of greed and a hunger for power makes for a duller plot than killer robots. It’s still plenty dangerous.

I share Bucks’ anger about the way tech sneaks into every crevice of our lives without us always noticing (or noticing too late) what we give up in return.

“I’m mad at myself for all the previous times I’ve been conned, when I thought that past technological breakthroughs actually would make my life better, when I excused somebody else’s love of wealth and power because my phone got cooler and played more songs on demand.”

Don’t look for much practical advice in his essay. It’s more like a love letter to being human.

“When everything that makes you human is outsourced to a big, dumb beep boop machine, the only logical responses is to revel in the absolute best parts of our humanity, loudly and collectively.”

“And that is enough, at least in aggregate, at least with persistence and organization and threads being tied between one community’s fight against a data center and another town’s valiant stand for all of our kids’ future.”

I’m hardly a purist here. I have a skeleton Facebook account for Marketplace sales, I still collaborate in Google Docs, and yes, I lean on the odd AI tool when a job is tedious enough.

Most of us are tangled up in these systems in one way or another – let’s not pretend otherwise. But being implicated doesn’t disqualify us from calling them out, in the same way you can drive a car and still argue for cities built around walking/cycling.

The difficult part is making sure the convenience doesn’t end up making our decisions. So it’s worth pausing to ask what we actually want from a human life, and whether the tools we reach for each day are bringing us closer to it or talking us out of it.

“We don’t need the robots. We never did. We need to be less alone, and less vulnerable to the whims of billionaires. We need our towns and neighborhoods to be celebrated, to feel like where we live and who we are matters. We need neighbors who pick up the slack when we reach the limit of our abilities and energy.”

“It isn’t just that we don’t want to die. It’s that we want to live, and we don’t want to do it alone.”

And now to this week’s discoveries. – Kai